Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5623 14
Original file (NR5623 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
pee ae ee er ee on a
PRE bw. It to ptt TE

 

 

PECTIC WT Ears

3

NTHOUESEL ROAD, SUITE 1007

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

TUR
Docket No: 5623-14
-15 January 2015

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United

States Code, Section 1552.

a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 January 2015. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your

allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereor, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters

Marine Corps, a Copy of which is attached.

Biter careful and conscientious consigeration of the entire
record, the Board Found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. in this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT uJ. O'NETLL
Executive Director

 

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3268 14

    Original file (NR3268 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on @ January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6179 14

    Original file (NR6179 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This request was denied on 30 September 2013. #, three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 January 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8229 14

    Original file (NR8229 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AEE. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava] Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2015. Cons sequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5160 14

    Original file (NR5160 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2015. After carefui and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9364 14

    Original file (NR9364 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR058 15

    Original file (NR058 15.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NKOO58-15 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11683 14

    Original file (NR11683 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    a oe — me AP wern sent DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ee OR BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS AN Se. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2015. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5773 14

    Original file (NR5773 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11217 14

    Original file (NR11217 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR11217-14 1 May 15 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2015. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUMED letter 1000 Ser M1/15UM10016 dated 25 February 2015, a copy of which is attached. NR11217-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6382 14

    Original file (NR6382 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.